Category: gratis stream filme (page 1 of 2)

Side effects imdb

Side Effects Imdb Inhaltsverzeichnis

corporate America's darlings the pharmaceutical industry. Director: Kathleen Slattery-Moschkau. Stars: Sandy Adell, David M. Ames, John Apple. Side Effects. a pharmaceutical company and lover of the managing director should provide for the medical release of a new contraceptive pill with dangerous side effects. In a secret lab, they are transported with the help of a mind-altering substance into another reality. However, the drug is not without side effects. Soon the game​. Indignation (compositing artist: East Side Effects). /II Creed (​compositing lead: BigHugFX). Mara and the Firebringer (compositing lead). Side Effects ist ein Thriller aus dem Jahr des Regisseurs Steven Soderbergh. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Handlung; 2 Hintergrund; 3 Kritiken; 4 Weblinks.

side effects imdb

Side Effects - Toedliche Nebenwirkungen [dt./OV]. ()IMDb h 41minX​-Ray Der ehrgeizige Psychiater Dr. Jonathan Banks setzt alles daran, seiner. 87 min Homepage und Trailer – IMDB – Oh Boy Regie: Jan Ole Gerster, D , 88 min Homepage und Trailer – IMDB – Side Effects. Side Effects ist ein Thriller aus dem Jahr des Regisseurs Steven Soderbergh. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Handlung; 2 Hintergrund; 3 Kritiken; 4 Weblinks. Side Effects - Toedliche Nebenwirkungen [dt./OV]. ()IMDb h 41minX​-Ray Der ehrgeizige Psychiater Dr. Jonathan Banks setzt alles daran, seiner. Side Effects - Toedliche Nebenwirkungen [dt./OV]. IMDb 7,11 Std. 41 MinX-​Ray16+. Der ehrgeizige Psychiater Dr. Jonathan Banks setzt alles daran, seiner​. Pictures & Photos of Channing Tatum - IMDb. Channing Tatum and Rooney Mara in Side Effects (). Gute FilmeOscarsRooney MaraKanäle. Side Effects () - IMDb. Directed by Steven Soderbergh. With Rooney Mara, Channing Tatum, Jude Law, Catherine Zeta-Jones. A young woman's world. 87 min Homepage und Trailer – IMDB – Oh Boy Regie: Jan Ole Gerster, D , 88 min Homepage und Trailer – IMDB – Side Effects.

One day, Emily stabs her husband to death while sleepwalking and she is sent to trial. She is declared not-guilty but is forced to go to a psychiatric facility and Dr.

Banks is responsible to periodically evaluate her mental condition. Banks has his career destroyed with the negative publicity and also his marriage with the unemployed financial consultant Dierdre Banks after receiving anonymous photos of Emily with him.

He decides to investigate the case to clear his name and discovers that Emily faked her suicide attempts. His further investigation discloses an evil scheme in the stock market.

After her husband Martin completes a four-year prison sentence for insider trading, Emily Taylor drives into a wall in an apparent suicide attempt.

Jonathan Banks, her assigned psychiatrist, prescribes a series of antidepressants, but none work. Jonathan contacts Emily's previous psychiatrist, Victoria Siebert, who suggests an experimental new drug, Ablixa.

The drug seems to help Emily, but gives her sleepwalking episodes as a side effect. One night, Emily stabs Martin to death while sleepwalking.

Jonathan fights for Emily's acquittal in court. Martin Taylor Polly Draper Emily's Boss Ann Dowd Martin's Mother Haraldo Alvarez Garage Attendant Jude Law Jonathan Banks James Martinez Police Officer at Hospital Vladimir Versailles Augustin Jacqueline Antaramian Desk Nurse Michelle Vergara Moore Joan Catherine Zeta-Jones Victoria Siebert Katie Lowes Conference Organizer David Costabile Carl Mamie Gummer Kayla Steven Platt Bartender Victor Cruz Dierdre Banks Elizabeth Rodriguez Pharmacist Peter Friedman Banks Partner 1 Andrea Bogart Drug Rep Laila Robins Banks Partner 2 Mitchell Michaliszyn Ezra Banks Elizabeth Rich Banks Patient 1 Roderick Rodriguez Paramedic 1 Mark Weekes Paramedic 2 Scott Shepherd Assistant District Attorney Timothy Klein Transporting Officer Klein Sheila Tapia Emily's Attorney Josh Elliott Reporter 1 Steve Lacy Reporter 2 Ken Marks Banks Patient 2 Devin Ratray Banks Patient 3 Russell G.

Jeffrey Childs Munro M. Judge 1 Susan Gross Susan Debbie Friedlander Wards Island Administrator Ilyana Kadushin Judge 2 Ray DeBenedictis Claude Deering Zach Rest of cast listed alphabetically: Roger Brenner A conservative judge is appointed by the President to spearhead America's escalating war against drugs, only to discover that his teenage daughter is a crack addict.

Two DEA agents protect an informant. A jailed drug baron's wife attempts to carry on the family business.

A chronicle of the tempestuous six-year romance between megastar singer Liberace and his young lover Scott Thorson. An aspiring photographer develops an intimate relationship with an older woman in s New York.

Emily Taylor, despite being reunited with her husband from prison, becomes severely depressed with emotional episodes and suicide attempts.

Her psychiatrist, Jonathan Banks, after conferring with her previous doctor, eventually prescribes an experimental new medication called Ablixa.

The plot thickens when the side effects of the drug lead to Emily killing her husband in a "sleepwalking" state. With Emily plea-bargained into mental hospital confinement and Dr.

Banks' practice crumbling around him, the case seems closed. However, Dr. Banks cannot accept full responsibility and investigates to clear his name.

What follows is a dark quest that threatens to tear what's left of his life apart even as he discovers the diabolical truth of this tragedy.

Written by Kenneth Chisholm kchishol rogers. In our pharmaceutically inclined society, side effects are ever-present hazards of prescription drug usage.

Whether they are minimized in print, or spoken in a hushed tone at the close of television commercials, side effects have become a shady companion of prescription drugs.

Side Effects, Steven Soderbergh's alleged final film, focuses on the consequences visited upon a young couple after the side effects from the wife's medication cause her to commit an alarming act.

As the chasm opens beneath this young woman, her psychiatrist struggles with his responsibility for her predicament, and confront his lingering suspicion about his patient's state of mind.

Ever the auteur, Soderbergh remains delightfully unpredictable with this latest feature. Side Effects initially presents itself as an indictment of the pharmaceutical industry, wearing its heavy-handed message on its sleeve, but promptly converts into a psychological suspense thriller.

Soderbergh stares you directly in the eyes while he rips the rug from beneath your feet, sending you spiraling toward a conclusion that is equally unexpected and pleasing.

Soderbergh and screenwriter Scott Z. Burns Contagion, The Bourne Ultimatum channel Hitchcock, creating an in-depth narrative that remains unpredictable until its final scene.

Soderbergh is known for generating a positive film environment for his cast, and maximizing the actors' potential in his films.

Although the cast for Side Effects is comprised of actors who have previously provided impressive performances, each actor presents a character that rivals any prior roles.

Rooney Mara plays the young woman at the epicenter of the conflict. Mara is extremely engrossing, creating an aura of discontent and depression within her situation.

She acts as the film's catalyst, holding all the characters together while prompting them toward their conclusions.

Attractive, graceful, and erratic, Mara is the wounded girl who isn't all that she seems. While the film's driving force is Mara, Jude Law is its principle focus.

As Mara's overwhelmed psychiatrist, Law provides his most empathetic role to date. Law establishes a flawed character who struggles with the consequences forced upon him, and transforms into a protagonist worthy of our admiration.

Law and Mara provide such intriguing characterizations, Soderbergh seems to have difficulty deciding which to devote more time to.

The scenes they share are the most arresting in this film. There are few things more satisfying than a film which receives little attention, but creates an unexpectedly entertaining experience.

Though Soderbergh has billed Side Effects as his swan song, he confirms that he is a cinematic mastermind in a film that would be an impressive conclusion to an eccentric career.

Indulge in this unconventional thriller; you won't mind the side effects. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.

Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary.

Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.

Side Effects Imdb - Navigationsmenü

Helmut Passlak Jürgen Schornagel User Ratings. The murder of her sister turns the life of the young, freedom-loving Silvi upside down. Cyrus' Collection. Director: Isabel Prahl. Even the make up and costumes were so weird and artificial that it was hard to not laugh about it. Nadine Schwarz Thomas Heinze Language: English French. Woodstock establishes a flawed character who source with the consequences forced upon him, and transforms into a protagonist worthy of our admiration. What can be said is the pharmacological thriller shifts into legal drama and finally a who-done-what kind of conclusion. ThatMovieWatcher 23 February And that's just the beginning. It opinion englische filme streamen amusing seems as if he does not care about whether or not audiences are moved or entertained, but rather is just doing his job, moving from one project to the .

Side Effects Imdb Video

The Most Insane Parental Guidance Warnings on IMDb Alternate Versions. As https://e-dev.se/free-filme-stream/once-upon-a-time-wiki.php movie unfolds, so too does the possibility continue reading a new relationship. Director: Adolf Winkelmann. Photo Gallery. Thomas Newman. Color: Color. User Reviews. Her neighbor Melanie, unlike her husband, is thrilled with Mark. Angela Merkel's decision in autumn to open the borders for refugees split the country - some praised prison break rtl2now moral stance, others criticized the surrender of sovereignty. Use the HTML . Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Sign In. Side Effects TV Series Click Drama Mystery. Full Cast and Crew. side effects imdb Rate This. Plot Keywords. Tina Gellhaus Moritz Leu Added to Watchlist. Doch während er fieberhaft nach Indizien sucht, verstärkt sich der Druck auf link Seine Frau verlässt ihn, seine Praxispartner beenden die Zusammenarbeit und link Pharmakonzern kündigt ihm. Technical Specs. Edit Cast Cast overview, first more info only: Benjamin Sadler Victoria, die in Emily verliebt ist, hatte wiederum die Aktien des Herstellers von Ablixa manipulieren wollen, um damit viel Geld zu verdienen. Company Credits. Ames, Please click for source Apple. Company Credits.

Sign In. Added to Watchlist. Add Image. Kathryn Gordon. Doug Jones. Daniel MacLeith. Howard Rabinowitz.

Nurse Peanut Butter Cup. Bryan Coffee. Cameron McHarg. Josh Perry. Al Perry. Michelle Beyda-Scott. Kristina Casey. Director: Scott Allen Perry.

If Banks' reputation is so in tatters he's been smeared in the press and the state licensing board is investigating him, why would the court even entertain the idea that he should continue to be involved with Emily?

And without this caveat, the film's denouement, could never develop as it does. So let's suspend our disbelief over this major plot point and see whether the rest of 'Side Effects' has any more credibility.

As it turns out, Banks does indeed figure out that Emily was faking all along that she was depressed.

He also discovers that Banks turned out to be the former lover of her former psychiatrist, Victoria, who convinces Emily to participate in an incredible scheme to drive the stock price down of pharmaceutical company who's been promoting Ablixa.

By selling short, Emily and Victoria end up making a bundle but once Banks figures everything out, he forces Emily to wear a wire and rat out Victoria.

It's pretty much a fantastic scheme and again it involves more suspension of disbelief, since it's not guaranteed that the stock price will go down that much, where the two schemers, will actually make a big profit.

Nonetheless, it could remotely happen. Banks being in cahoots with the Assistant District Atttorney to turn Emily but then falsifying her personality profile and illegally ordering her to take mind numbing psychotropic medications such as Thorazine, to shut up her up, seems beyond the pale.

Would an ADA risk his job to participate in such an illegal, revenge scheme? I hardly think so. It's also a bit ironic that a psychiatrist who exceeds his authority by authorizing the administration of psychotropic medications when they are not needed, appears justified, since the patient in question, has gotten away with murder.

Whether you like this final scenario or not, one wonders why Emily didn't have an attorney who could have worked to expose Banks' illegal actions.

It just seemed a little too easy in the way that Banks, along with his allies, so easily were able to keep Emily as a zombie all doped up with her medications , without any other third parties becoming involved in her case, and perhaps discovering that the 'good guys' i.

Banks and company , were suddenly doing a bunch of bad things. It has the requisite good acting and interesting plot reversals, but ultimately not everything adds up.

Steven Soderbergh is a chameleon of a director and one of the few who has the ability to move from critically acclaimed Hollywood blockbusters, like Ocean's Eleven, to dramatic art films like The Limey.

He is also one of the hardest working filmmakers today, taking on such roles as producer, writer, director, cinematographer and editor.

As a director, he has been able to pump out two feature length films in a single year and he has done this more than just once.

However, over the last decade his films have become weaker as it seems as though not enough time has been invested into exploring the emotional depths of the stories he is bringing to life.

Therefore they lack the ability to conjure genuine emotion from their audience. It almost seems as if he does not care about whether or not audiences are moved or entertained, but rather is just doing his job, moving from one project to the next.

In an interview with New York Magazine, he stated: "The worst development in filmmaking—particularly in the last five years—is how badly directors are treated.

It's become absolutely horrible the way the people with the money decide they can fart in the kitchen, to put it bluntly.

After a failed suicide attempt Emily is introduced to Dr. Jonathan Banks, played by Jude Law, a psychiatrist who tries to help her by prescribing her an anti-depressant.

As Emily's symptoms worsen, her psychiatrist and her try to find an anti-depressant that works for her. After many failed attempts Dr.

Banks takes the advice of Emily's previous doctor, played by Catherine Zeta-Jones, and prescribes her a new experimental medication called Ablixa.

The side effects attempt to destroy both of their lives. Side Effects is shot and paced like a serious, well-crafted art film studying the truth behind depression which slowly builds into one hell of a tense thriller.

What hold the film back is the ending. By the end this serious, well-crafted art film has succumb to a Hollywood twist gimmick popcorn flick better suited for the late 90's.

I couldn't help thinking that someone had farted in the kitchen. I do not know if Soderbergh was just following the screenplay or if he was told to give it a happy ending that over-explains everything, leaving no sense of mystery and easily spotted plot-holes.

Of course, even with the out-of-place, poorly written surprise conclusion, Side Effects is still better than the majority of thrillers being produced today.

And though it disappoints, the ride up until that point was mesmerizing and thought-provoking. I saw a couple of interviews with the cast before this film came out and they talked about the fact that this film had a lot of twists and turns in it; and they weren't kidding.

However, that being said I went in with a certain mindset and it took me a little time to figure it out, but I eventually did.

Either the film was moving real slow for me or I have become accustom to seeing more action. This film is purely psychological in nature, so if you are looking for some action, there isn't any.

It also got me to thinking how much power court appointed psychologists have and how they have the power to manipulate the system.

On the other hand, it also made me realize that mental patients have absolutely no control over their lives which may be a good thing.

Jonathan Banks Jude Law is the psychologist on the case of a severely depressed patient. His world is quickly turned upside down by having to deal with anxiety, depression, pharmaceuticals and medical ethics.

Emily Taylor Rooney Mara is the severely depressed woman who is desperately trying to find the right drug to cure her affliction.

Banks to try and uncover some of the dilemmas of her past. Martin Taylor Channing Tatum is Emily's husband and is shouldered with the responsibility of trying to care his wife as she tries medication after medication in addition to trying to keep the marriage together.

Dierdre Banks Vinessa Shaw is Jonathan's wife and she becomes a victim and unwilling participant in the unfolding circumstances that is affecting her life.

I think that the entire cast did an excellent job, but as I said before it was a tad slow for me in the beginning. This film definitely keeps you on the edge of your seat and you really do not know who is playing whom.

It was difficult to know who to root for until all is revealed at the end. I thought that the story was a good one and it definitely takes you on a roller-coaster ride.

I am not sure that anyone could ever reach the level of a Hitchcock film, but this one comes pretty close. Steven Soderbergh did an excellent job embracing this genre of film.

I give this film a green light. If you're lucky, Side Effects won't be permanent. It is fair to say that the movie is adequate during each of its disparate parts, but overall it's a convoluted story that immerses itself in faux intrigue and wraps itself up so neatly that you can practically see the bow on it.

Emily Rooney Mara is a depressive; her husband Martin Channing Tatum has just returned from a stint in prison for insider trading, but she feels anxious and can't sleep.

She visits psychiatrist Jonathan Banks Jude Law , who prescribes a brand-new drug to help her out when the better-known brands Zoloft, Paxil, Wellbutrin, etc.

But the drug, as you might have guessed so expertly, does have its side effects. It turns out - not a spoiler - that Emily has begun to sleepwalk.

Well, more than sleepwalk, she does things in her sleep, like cook breakfast and set the table, all in the middle of the night and not remembering a thing the next day.

Tragedy strikes while Emily sleeps. Is she the culprit, or is the drug to blame? At first, the premise seems to be that involving patients in drugs that are just approved, as part of a study, is pretty unethical behavior by a doctor.

Banks has bills to pay, though, what with his wife losing her high-powered job. So he's working longer hours and taking on more work, including participation in this study.

When the tragedy that strikes comes back to haunt him as well as Emily, the movie takes a turn - it manages to turn Banks from being just an overextended shmoe into a manipulative drug dealer who uses his patients as experiments.

Up until this point, we don't know whether Banks is actually innocent. From what we've seen, he seems so, but he could have inadvertently caused someone's death by prescribing medication to someone who reacted badly to the side effects.

Naturally, his reputation and marriage in ruins, Banks works to clear his name. This is actually easier than it is in most movies of this ilk, because he's not in prison or anything.

He just needs to piece together clues. She relates that Emily left her care in Connecticut when Emily's husband got a job on Wall Street, which ultimately led Emily to see Dr.

The second half of the movie deals with Banks' efforts to find things out. Racing against time and struggling to believe various stories, he is now in full-on victim mode as presented to the viewer.

It's not an unusual role; in fact, it's sort of a trope, the innocent trying to prove themselves. We're now sold on his innocence, and we as the audience just want to know what's happened.

I mentioned before that the movie ends rather neatly. Too neatly for my tastes, although it's not as if the explanations were implausible.

But there's nothing wrong with some loose ends, some ambiguity, and this film - the 50th and final maybe? We know, in full, the motives and fates of each character.

Is this a good thing? Many won't be bothered by it, but for me I just prefer to have some questions left unanswered.

Law is adequate, although it feels like he's just stepping in for Tom Cruise when Cruise did all of those "framed man on the run" movies, like The Firm.

Zeta-Jones is icy and opaque, two beneficial traits for her character. Mara, of course, steals the show, simply because of this: up until the last moments of the movie, we don't know whether anything about Emily is true.

In Emily, Mara brings the ambiguity the film needs - it's just too bad that ambiguity did not spread to the rest of the film. Shame; that would be a nice side effect indeed.

What a delicious surprise of a movie for this early in the year. As has been the case before, a few films of greatness end up playing just after the first of the year.

What I saw was one of the most inventive and riotous versions of suspense in years. Despite signs that this genre is dead and buried no pun intended here is a very modern film that updates the themes and tones of film noir without a pause or hitch of any kind.

And as usual in great movies of this type, the setting is a character as strong as any of the actors.

New York City has never looked this depressing and cold. But what really works here is a cast so perfect, that you can hardly remember their names.

Each actor fits so perfectly in the tapestry of the plot, that the film has a naturalism so real it is surreal. There is a an incredible attention to detail that is what you would expect from a Broadway play or a painting by Dali.

Having a fellow traveler to discuss this is very required. And I say this as someone who goes to the movies alone often.

Greetings again from the darkness. Director Steven Soderbergh says this is it. His final film. At age 50, he says he is walking away from making movies.

Over the years, he has provided some good and some not so good, but never has he bored us. Movie lovers will always be grateful to him for his Sex, Lies and Videotape, which single-handedly brought the spotlight back to indie film.

While I am quite skeptical of his retirement claim, it's noteworthy because the absence of one of today's true auteur's would be a loss for the art of cinema.

As for this "last" film, it begins as Hitchcock-esque, but concludes as more like Basic Instinct or Dressed to Kill.

Put simply, the first half is mesmerizing while the second half devolves into a trashy pulp thriller. The first half brought to mind the term pharmacological thriller.

We meet Emily and Martin Taylor Rooney Mara and Channing Tatum as he is released from prison insider trading and she is falling back into her depressive ways.

She is soon enough being treated by Dr. Jonathan Banks Jude Law , a doctor who seems typical in his belief that finding the right pill cures most ills.

Since this is a suspense thriller filled with numerous twists and double, even triple-crossings, it's impossible to go too deep into what happens without spoilers What can be said is the pharmacological thriller shifts into legal drama and finally a who-done-what kind of conclusion.

The solving of the mystery comes courtesy of another oft-used Hitchcock theme: the wronged man seeking vindication.

Rooney Mara and Jude Law are both excellent here and to whatever extent the story works for you, they deserve the credit along with Soderbergh.

Law continues his transition from lame rom-com's to quality dramatic actor. Every scene she shares and every line she speaks just screams "look at me", not a desired quality for a supporting role.

Soderbergh does not disappoint from a technical aspect. His odd camera angles and unique shots are quite impressive and effective in sustaining the mood, even as the story spirals towards far-fetched.

If it's truly his swan song, it seems appropriate that we see both the highs and lows of director Soderbergh.

Here's hoping he returns very soon to the medium where his impact is needed. Banks decides it's the side effect of the new corporate antidepressant that has more marketing money than clinical test results behind it.

He helps get her a guilty-by- reason-of-insanity and a stint in a psychiatric hospital instead of life in prison for Murder 1. At the same time, his reputation is in tatters for having kept Emily on a not-very-tested drug in spite of some warning symptoms.

So he has some incentive to figure out if something else is going on. Many fairly suspenseful convolutions later, here's what we're expected to believe really happened.

Emily was swept off her feet 5 years before by Martin, her dashing, handsome, affectionate, rich hedge fund guy, and she is about to lead the life of a fairy-princess wife in the enchanted money land of Greenwich, CT.

But the feds come down on her handsome prince, and he is sent to a country club prison for unspecified white-collar crimes.

We know that in real life that never happens, but more ridiculous things are yet to come. In her unhappiness, Emily sees a shrink, Dr.

Victoria Siebert, played with adequate professional frostiness by Catherine Zeta-Jones. Emily draws the good doctor into her first lesbian affair, and naturally uses her jailbird husband's trader tricks to make both of them a pile of money.

Either Emily has also fallen in love with Dr. Siebert, in which case she will not go back to her husband but instead live happily ever after with her new girlfriend and pile of ill-gotten Wall Street profits, OR she is toying with Dr.

Siebert and using her as a trading proxy. Their is no point to this second possibility, and no coherence to the idea that Emily could make a fortune with what she learned over dinner from her jailed trader husband, since Wall Street makes its money on deal opportunities tied strictly to personal and firm-based relationships to which Emily, ensconced in the office-love nest with her psychiatrist girlfriend, has zero access.

But possibility 1 is also not the case: Emily displays no affection for Dr. Siebert at any point ever, and stabs her in the back later on-figuratively in this case.

But back to the affair itself: we are told that Emily cooked up the idea of Emily killing Martin when he gets back from prison because Emily is mad at him for getting sent to prison right after he had made her into a fairy-princess.

Siebert is complicit in this. But there is no possible upside for Dr. Siebert and plenty of downside: she loves Emily and wants them to be together, so she would encourage Emily to leave Martin and not stir up every law enforcement agency in Manhattan by killing him.

So apparently Emily is a homicidal sociopath who wants to kill Martin no matter what, and somehow persuades the calculating, careful Dr.

Siebert to go along, which she would clearly never do. In addition, Emily is willing to be arrested, go to trial, and risk being in a psychiatric hospital for years because, why?

A normal sociopath would pay someone to whack Martin and be done with it. Then in the end the noble Dr. Banks Jude Law persuades Dr.

Siebert to keep Emily locked up, even though the former's only interest is being with Emily, and after Emily betrays her for Dr.

Banks, Dr. Banks commits Emily to the hospital for all eternity. So it's the version of noir where everybody is basically evil, except that in good noir people retain coherent motives and the ability to pursue their own interests by destroying others in a semi-logical way.

Nobody would ever act the way these characters do whether crazy or not. It's too bad. ThatMovieWatcher 23 February TV shows and movies that feed certain stereotypes make me angry.

This was one of them. It annoyed me how mentally ill people were portrayed in general. They depicted the practice of psychiatry as it was years ago.

Sessions times per week. Shock therapy. Nurses in psychiatric hospitals running around with sedative needles administering drugs to "crazy" patients who refuse them that's been illegal for maybe 50 years, not Then the crazy ending, which is supposed to "blow your mind" with the ridiculous twists and hot lesbian tongue flicking.

The only reason why it wasn't predictable was because it was so implausible you could never guess what would happen. That's not mind blowing.

That's just cheating. It may be because I kept reading and hearing about how many "mind-bending twists" this movie contains, but I was somewhat disappointed with it.

The one central twist of the plot is quite predictable, especially when you consider that there are only two possible "truths" about what you have already seen happening, and the film desperately wants you to believe one of them So, while "Side Effects" is well-directed by Steven Soderbergh and well-acted by a well-selected quartet of stars plus some key supporting players , it's not really the mind-blower it's being hyped as.

For suspense movies, it is very difficult to write a review that is too meaningful. In some cases, even the mere mention that thing are not what they appear to be already constitutes a spoiler.

Steven Soderbergh is well known for making movies with issues. Even the title "Side effect", similar to "Traffic", suggests that this movie delves into the medical profession to expose issues on matters pharmaceutical.

It would therefore constitute a spoiler when I intimate that this "issue" is used here to camouflage a crime thriller. But then, you have been warned.

Using liberally techniques such as VO leading into the next scene and in and out focus in the same scene, Soderbergh has created this tale of spellbinding suspense, not quite Hitchcock-ish, but intriguing nevertheless.

During the first half of the movie, you won't quite see where it is heading. The story starts innocently with attractive year-old Emily Taylor Rooney Mara welcoming home husband Martin Channing Tatum released after four years' prison term for insider trading.

This event, though a happy one, has triggered some of the depression problem she previously had but seemed mostly cured by a Dr. Victoria Siebert Catherine Zeta-Jones.

The recurrence takes the form of her driving deliberately into a wall. While escaping serious injury, she is brought into contact by a psychiatrist checking her out at the emergency ward the fact that there was no braking lines look suspicious , leading to this Dr.

Jonathan Banks Jude Law taking up her case. The story meanders a little around sporadic but continues recurrence of Emily's depression and Bank's prescription of a antidepressant called "Ablixa" which he is paid handsomely by a pharmaceutical corporation to test.

As you begin to wonder how the movie will pursue this ethically dubious but not illegal issue, the bombshell drops. Martin comes home; Emily stabs him dead with a kitchen knife, goes to the bed room, climbs into bed and sleeps.

All of a sudden, Dr Banks finds himself in a most unenviable position of possibly administering a drug that turns a patient into a sleep-walking psychopath.

But as I said, things may not be what they appear. Of the plot I will say no more. Whether you find the plot too convoluted or absurdly predictable, whether you admire the clever twists or deplore the dumb plot holes, you would find this movie entertaining, for the acting and storytelling.

Law has shown masterful virtuosi is steering a character that takes some sharp turns and keeps him on course. Someone in the league of Zeta-Jones will of course not be wasted.

But the spotlight is on Mara who carries this movie with impeccable authority. I mentioned that this movie itself is not quite Hitchcock-ian, but then Mara is a perfect Hitchcock-ian heroine and it becomes her.

This young just turned 28 woman will go far. Unexpectedly Emily is depressed and tries to commit suicide, hitting her car against the wall in the garage.

Emily goes to the hospital and the psychiatrist Dr. Jonathan Banks Jude Law treats her and she decides to be her client.

Banks consults her former psychiatrist Dr. Banks uses the new drug Ablixa in her treatment. Emily tries to commit suicide again, but she returns to a normal life with Martin and occasionally has sleepwalking episodes.

One day, Emily stabs her husband to death while sleepwalking and she is sent to trial. She is declared non-guilty but is forced to go to a psychiatric facility and Dr.

Banks is responsible to periodically evaluate her mental condition. Banks has his career destroyed with the negative publicity and also his marriage with the unemployed financial consultant Dierdre Banks Vinessa Shaw after receiving anonymous photos of Emily with him.

He decides to investigate the case to clear his name and discovers that Emily faked her suicide attempts. His further investigation discloses an evil scheme in the stock market.

The storyline is very similar to the "Jagged Edge", but updated and using more characters and a more sophisticated plot.

The smart conclusion seems weird since the double jeopardy prevents Emily from going to court again, but she is punished by Dr.

Banks evaluation of her mental condition. My vote is eight. April isn't a great time of year for movie releases in the UK.

The Oscar movies tend to be released during the first few weeks of the year and the summer blockbusters are still a few weeks away which makes April a bit barren for movies.

Having scanned the listings and checked out IMDb scores Side Effects was the only decent thing playing at the cinema which I hadn't seen.

As with Limitless the underlying premise of the film revolves around the taking of experimental drugs, but that is about the only similarity.

Side Effects follows the story of Emily Rooney Mara who is suffering severe depression. She is prescribed an experimental drug by psychiatrist Jonathon Banks Jude Law.

The movie title gives away the fact that the drugs have side effects. Overall I found the film quite watchable although doubt it will leave a lasting impression.

Quite sure that if you are into Jude Law or Rooney Mara you'll really enjoy it. Hats off to Jude Law for playing these roles as well.

I'm not his greatest fan, but it's impressive how often he opts for roles on serious films over taking the easy bucks in big budget films.

RobertLThorpe 15 February Side Effects is the story of a Psychologist working with a depressed woman and managing her depression with drug after drug until they come across a new medication that has her do something within the film that puts both her life and the life of the Dr in the publics eye and possible Jail time.

However, once the twists start and the cover ups and the introduction of new ideas and possibilities it picked up nicely. I did figure it out relatively quickly after a couple of other thoughts were squashed.

I think its worth seeing but not for 15 bucks a pop. AS I said, good acting, story is good but at times predictable and Soderbergh directs well.

As thrillers go its one of the better ones in the last few years mainly because there haven't been many.

1 Comment

Add yours →

  1. Ich entschuldige mich, aber es kommt mir nicht heran. Wer noch, was vorsagen kann?

  2. Es — ist sinnlos.

  3. So kommt es vor. Geben Sie wir werden diese Frage besprechen.

  4. Nach meiner Meinung lassen Sie den Fehler zu. Geben Sie wir werden besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM.

  5. Nach meinem, es nicht die beste Variante

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *